Showing this was not about security at all.
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
237 points (98.8% liked)
News
33337 readers
2481 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It never was
One could argue surveillance and tracking is about security. They'd be wrong. But they could argue that.
That's absolutely about security. Just not yours. There's a lot of people whose financial security is at risk if they can't sell that data.
Well, it's never been about security, it's about surveillance. But it is reasonable to assume that REAL ID is their most efficient way to track travelers, and if you make them use their less efficient methods of tracking, they'll offset the difference by charging you directly.
Title leaves out "or passport."
In a push to get you to think you must have a Real ID, I've noticed the media constantly leaves out or minimizes the fact that a passport is sufficient to get you through an airport or any other place a Real ID is required.
So no extra fee of you have a passport.
You know some dumb shit TSA is gonna not understand that part.
I've always just considered a passport to be a Real ID™.
From the U.S. Department of State website: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/passports/passports-realid.html
The U.S. passport book and passport card are both REAL ID compliant.
load more comments
(1 replies)
We still need to go through the process to make sure that we verify who you are
As long as I don't have any weapons it shouldn't matter.
but how else will we track where everyone is all the time
Unless you are using a fake ID and fake credit card then they already have that data?
They know John Smith who lives at 123 Main Street in Bumbfuck, WI and who paid with credit card 1234567890123456 is flying from MSN to LAX on December 1st, 2025 and returning via the same route on December 3rd, 2025.
The RealID requirements are to, theoretically, streamline the process of matching person to face with more standardized ID requirements. Like all ID related legislature there is good and bad there.
But if your focus is on The Man tracking you? This changes nothing unless you are already actively committing fraud at MANY levels.
neat. there is no reason they even need an id. do you need one to gain access to the highways?
load more comments
(7 replies)
I suspect this is what the payment requirement is really about. Like, yes they're getting money, but they're also getting a credit card transaction at the gate at the date and time of travel.
It's always possible that someone else purchased your travel ticket for you (for instance I sometimes travel for work which my employer's travel agency books for me). But if you have to pay at the moment when your ID would be checked, presumably that has to be your personal card that you have on you in the moment.
My understanding is that most airlines will still allow you to pay, in cash, at the customer service desk in the baggage area the day of. But they still require ID and you can be DAMNED sure that about forty different flags went off in a database if you do that.
But yeah. Credit cards are immensely useful. They also go a LONG way towards providing very trackable behaviors for people.
Plenty of people are flying on tickets purchased by a corporation.
A meme of jd vance is the most dangerous weapon of all
Oh shit I'm cooked
It would only make sense if it was a one time fee, and you got your ID as a result.
We also know it’s not about security, or you couldn’t fly without one.
We know it’s a cash grab because they’re counting on a “built-in” amount of flyers who won’t have or will refuse to get ID with privacy issues. If, by some anomaly, more or all flyers acquire the ID, then we’d see maintenance fees added and the fee itself increased to maintain revenue certainty - but who are we kidding, those things will eventually happen anyways.
I was under the impression real id was required to fly. This article is the first hint I've seen that it's not. I wonder if that changed recently?
Or passport. I fly fairly regularly for work and don't have a "REAL ID" star on my license
load more comments
(2 replies)
My guess is the intent was always revenue…not security. Security was just the pretext for new revenue, because margins are thin and there’s a certain proportion of people who will pay to prioritize privacy.
I’ve barely kept track of it, but I think it kept getting knocked down by courts?
A passport is a really good thing to have, and lasts much longer than a Real ID state license. It ends up costing like $13/yr and it opens up the whole world to you. It blows my mind that on;y 50% of US citizens ever bother getting one.
Many citizens don't leave their state. Plenty of them are hand to mouth and can't afford groceries. Even local travel is a luxury to some, so I can understand why they might not have the desire to go through the process and pay for the passport, not to mention that many people don't know their SSN or have their birth certificates.
Don't forget that transgender Americans can't get passports with the correct gender, either.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I paid for a real id license when they were first available in my state, and I’ve paid for a renewal. I disagree with the surveillance society they enable but I’m also a realist who wants to travel conveniently.
But I’ve still never gotten one. When it comes down to it, actually getting a real id license requires taking a day off work and waiting in line at the Registry …… whereas I can renew a standard license online and have a few years left on my passport
One of the many ways RealID has been a fiasco is RMV/DMV’s not staffing up to support it
I'm in a backass hillbilly state but I just made an appointment at the DMV and then had to wait all of 5 minutes when I got there. But, then they tried to argue every single piece of paper I brought which involved calls to supervisors so it wound up being a 40 minute ordeal. I swear they don't want you to actually get it.
oh so it was never about security.
The agency warns that even then, there is no guarantee that individuals will be cleared to cross through the security checkpoint.
Bummer, that’s another $45 to re-check until they get it right. I’m guessing this will happen a lot.
I mean that's obvious. Otherwise you're just paying $45 to ignore the security checkpoint if you're guaranteed to get through with payment.
load more comments
(1 replies)
While this is ridiculous. The original requirement date for a real id was 2008. It has been 20 years since real id was passed. You have had 20 years to get one.
Dude it was hard enough for my wife to get a new ID (not REAL) when we moved from RI to MA.
I do all the bills and handle all the finances. My credit was better (now we are about equal) and so all the utilities and most the credit cards are in my name. Not to mention most of them are paperless.
At the time, I think she was also still on a cell phone plan with her siblings.
So, like, absolutely no official-enough mail coming to our house to her name. And they need 2.
What, exactly, is the purpose of an ID, and why does it need my SSN and two pieces of mail? How does that identify me, as a person, any more than a supporting document like an existing US Passport? If I qualified for a US Passport, why the hell do I need so much more on top of that for just a state issued ID.
The whole thing is a scam to bully minorities and put an additional burden on traveling for low-income families. I wonder how many people are missing flights to some important and unexpected event (i.e. a funeral) because they never fly and never had a reason to get a REAL ID.
For that matter, I'd really like to know what TSA gets out of a REAL ID that they don't get out of a regular license, for domestic travel? They don't care about my proof of residence, they only care that the name matches the boarding pass and the face, and isn't Islamic or otherwise off-white.
Shhh... You're saying the quiet parts out loud.
How long until they require it to vote so it shuts out a majority of the voters from participating in elections?
You know your wife could use a passport to fly, right?
And she did, last time we flew. Domestically. Which is absurd.
No other real reason to make a special trip to the RMV just to upgrade the license. Certainly not to pay a fee to get it and still keep the same expiration date on her license. So not even extending it.
My state didn't start offering them until 2018, and our IDs are good for 5 years. Also, our DVS was a complete shitshow at the time with regular licenses taking up to 6 months to arrive, and double that for a real id. People avoided them so they wouldn't have to renew a temporary license every 3 months.
Realistically, people in my state have had an average of one opportunity to get a real id on renewal.
My state had extremely limited appointments for Real ID applications. Then they casually offered an "upgrade" when I went to add an endorsement in 2021 because they went to no-walk-in appointment system and suddenly had all the time in the world on their hands
So is this just legal way to bribe the TSA
Oh no, guess I’ll have to not fly even harder 🤷♂️
Makes me wonder why they don’t want people flying. All these different things being done to make it harder for the average person to fly. I suppose it could just be incompetence, but it really feels like there’s intent behind it.
Fucking ABC and their autoplay of videos
I mean, at this point we’ve known it was coming for like 20 years now - really no excuse to not have one.
My excuse was I didn't want a federal ID card. Not under a democrat and especially not under Trump.
you mean that?
view more: next ›