this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
377 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
2842 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Imagine losing internet access because someone in your household downloaded pirated music."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan@upvote.au 160 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Should the USPS/AusPost/your local postal service be allowed to cut off a household's postal service because someone received pirated CDs in the mail? That's essentially the same thing. If anything, internet access is more important than mail these days.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 134 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A private business keeps accusing you of operating a meth lab using city water, now they get to sue the city water provider for not cutting you off. That's basically what this is

[–] dan@upvote.au 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is probably a better analogy. Thanks.

Only if the private biz sells meth

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 118 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wanna push everyone to the dark web? This is how you do it. People will just become obsessed with covering their tracks. You'll have to rip open countless companies and organizations to get this to work. Fuck 'em. Prying eyes can eat shit and die.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You might be exaggerating people's technical knowledge, desire to increase their technical knowledge, and / or their desire to effect change.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Running i2p or Tor isn't that challenging and demand drives innovation. I could see one-click solutions taking off in a few months if people were willing to pay a few bucks a month to download basically anything the dark web can offer.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TOR is easy enough to set up that if you know how to install a program on your computer and run it, you're good to go. It's not the ideal way to run TOR, and is still somewhat insecure, but can be done in a few clicks.

Back in the early 00's, the amount of people learning how to download pirated music safely, arrange and burn a CD with it skyrocketed. Fast forward a few years and people with no real computer skills were learning how to rip and burn DVDs.

I wouldn't underestimate the potential of people with motivation to circumvent an oppressive system.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most people won't run an ad blocker.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Most people don't know extensions exist. Because they don't care and have never been shown.

Pissing someone off is a strong motivator for them to start searching though.

On the flip side what choice will they have after sony's AI gets them cut off by claiming rights to the pictures of thier own kids on facebook. They will need lots of tech to get back online. And we know there are people who will find a way to make it dead simple.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

… or their disposable energy after working 10h and caring for the kids.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 114 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I am fully confident they will make the worst, and most unconstitutional, choice.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They will make the choice that they are paid to make

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Clearance Thomas has entered chat.

"Nothing in the constitution says internet use is a right"

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Of course, the illegitimate Fed Soc ones will

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm gonna go to businesses I don't like, hop on the Wi-Fi, and pirate from all the most obvious trackers.

[–] ChaosSpectre@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This seems like the best strategy realistically. If scotus makes it everyones problem, then make it a problem for those with the most to lose from losing internet access.

Starbucks in particular would have a bad time lol

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They wouldn't though, large businesses see no consequences from laws that you and I would see consequences for.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then you get your pirated content with no worry, for once I seethis as a win win!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, then it just becomes a defacto situation of the content creation companies (Disney, Sony, etc) owning the telecom companies. So you will truly be a single content household, like a Disney Household or a Paramount Household.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Great sentiment but we all know a business will get a pass for this just like when Meta got busted torrenting all those books and were told its okay because they're using it to train their AI.

only one way to find out!

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that the conclusion? I thought that's still under investigation. I remember reading about it months after the first reports.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

It intentionally got buried in legal, it's likely going to take 10 years and end up as a settlement out of court

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"Wanna learn about the threats to your livelihood posed by this upcoming court case? Pay us just $5 a month! Don't worry, we'll automatically increase that to $10 a month after three months. No action required."

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

Careful, you could lose Internet access for that

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember when a certain company just paid a large fine for pirating information to train AI?

So step 1 should be to remove Internet access to Meta, if you aren't going to do that, then it is 100% corrupt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sony so mad at Cox for not cutting off someone's Internet for downloading they'll take it to the SCOTUS, but they won't even use the frankly abusive laws they already have access to to just sue the end user? What is even going on?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sony wanted mo money. Yo money wasn't enough for them. So they got a jury to agree that Cox owes them 1 Billion dollars.

Let's all sing about how much we love Corporate Governance.

^Please^ ^don't^ ^shut^ ^off^ ^my^ ^internet^ ^telecom^ ^daddy^ ^I'll^ ^drink^ ^another^ ^Mountain^ ^Dew^ ^Verification^ ^Can!^

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because those laws aren't doing enough to scare people into obeying. This is the next step in trying to terrorize people into submission.

[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sony is really anti consumer. I went to buy one of their PC games the other day, but it is not available in the country I am presently in right now along with a few other developing counties when I looked into it. So if you want the title, your only option is Torrent it and such which I am sure is common here.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sony is really anti consumer.

Throwback to when Sony intentionally packaged literal rootkits on their music CDs, so anyone who used the CD to play music had the rootkit automatically installed. And then when they were forced to make a rootkit remover, they simply installed more malware to hide any file names that matched the rootkit’s name. Which introduced an easy way for hackers to hide their own malware, by simply naming it the same as the rootkit.

Right. I forgot about that. What a despicable company. It is almost like to be successful, you have to play dirty but I am not so sure it is Sony’s fault per se as if they don’t their competitors will, which will always ensure the dirty players win. It is a systemic failure of society that we have allowed unchecked Capitalism which ironically will eventually suck the oxygen out of the room to even its own detriment.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope the SCOTUS justices aren't using 3-strikes-you're-out ISPs! All it would take is three random DMCA takedown notices and they'd lose Internet.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 week ago

What a FASCINATING concept!

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

USians are gonna be required to get federal internet licenses but not federal gun licenses

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

all the better to remove the federal internet license requirements.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago

The ruling could determine whether access to the internet—today’s lifeline for education, work, and civic life—can be taken away as punishment for digital misdeeds

And this is how we get a CCP Digital Firewall. Combine this with the Flock cameras, Ring doorbells, and years of data networks collecting information on us for advertising, and I do not see this going well at all.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

accused of repeat copyright infringements

Does this court determine whether this concrete accusation against a person holds as well, or does this court determine whether an accusation is enough?

[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They will let A.I. resolves disputes, just like YouTube does.

/s

or is it /s?

[–] tym@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hold your forearm out so I can compare it to this color palette. We'll go from there. /s

[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

americans sure are getting a hell of a time

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago

Sadly, a lot of the internet is hosted in America, so anything that fucks them will fuck us

load more comments
view more: next ›