this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
124 points (98.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

38311 readers
1212 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Are (over)pants underpants if you don’t wear something under them?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How long does your pubic hair have to be to qualify as underpants?

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends on how fat your ass is. But anywhere from 3 to 6 feet.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What if you wear underpants over your pants? Does that makes pants overpants underpants pants.

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You're gonna need to check with a kindergarten teacher. They're actually trained to answer questions like that.

That makes you Superman

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's called free balling and no.

[–] Bhaelfur@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How many pants could underpants pants if underpants could pants pants?

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Six.

Seven if it's a woodchuck in underpants.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

The brits neatly sidestep this quandry by calling them pants and trousers respectively, and I think they've honestly got the superior system there. I mean one of our American gods (Superman) wears them on the outside, how can we continue in good conscience to call them "under"-pants?

[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are they still underpants if you're wearing them over pants?

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Superman enters the chat.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well they are not overpants

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Akshually, those are tights, not pants. And those "underpants" are short pants.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about the waterproof overpants that keep your regular pants dry?????

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Look man, I'm trying here. I don't have all the answers so you'll have to figure some things out for yourself. Good luck.

::jumps onto sky cycle and flies away::

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

You're right, they're just over legs at that point.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Should my dog see a vet if it underpants?

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Not if it's nose is still wet.

But they shouldn't drive to the vet, just in case.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

The yanks had it wrong; underpants never existed. Just pants and trousers

Is it still an underpass if you're not passing anything?
Is it still an overpass if you ain't over shit?

[–] url@feddit.fr 2 points 1 day ago

They are panties

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Inpantception 2: Under the Underpants

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I suggest establishing a formal hierarchy of *-pants, with individual terms to distinguish shape, purpose and colour in conjunction with effective and/or absolute layer. And you should be the one to do it, because I don't have time for that.

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

4th dimensional pants (Hyperpants)

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Layer-0 pants are the ones touching your arse.
Layer-1 pants cover Layer-0 (tights, stockings, trousers).
Layer-2 pants (optional) cover Layer-1 (shorts over tights, trousers, etc..)

Simple

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Layer-3 pants (optional, temporary) - Protective legwear. (Snow pants, motorcycle/horseback chaps, shin guards)

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

Layer -(-1) privledged layer, accessible only through permission system

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

With diagrams explaining, in detail, the purpose and function of each layer. By Monday, or you're fired.