this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
726 points (95.0% liked)

You Should Know

42157 readers
1085 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 199 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Deduct. And the USA is taking the world in completely the opposite direction from where it needs to go.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

It would be nice if we could deduce them.

[–] thfi@discuss.tchncs.de 133 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Finally! Do you have an idea how expensive those things are and how much my wage slaves must work for that?

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

The cost ranges from $30,000 to over $100M

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 96 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The law, in its majestic equality, allows rich and poor alike to deduct private jet expenses from their taxes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 78 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For example, a $3 million aircraft purchase – of America’s favorite business jet, the Pilatus PC‑12 – could potentially lower your tax liability by over $1 million if you’re in the 35 % bracket. This isn’t just savings; the Big Beautiful Bill private aircraft subsidy offers financial strategy at its finest. You can read more about the tax benefits of private aircraft ownership in our special report here.

Thanks magats

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The PC-12 is a turboprop, not a jet, though.

It's a leech hauler alright, but not a jet.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The distinction isn't relevant to the point being made. Although the article title says "jets", the body of the article uses the more generic "aircraft" interchangeably with "jet."

~~I'd expect this is applicable to helicopters as well, though they have a different usage.~~

Edit: I looked it up and apparently helicopters are not included. The distinguishing feature is "fixed wing" aircraft.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Certainly a bigger problem is how someone who can afford over $1M private jet would be in only the 35% bracket

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Carighan@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

Buy two! Save double!

[–] who@feddit.org 55 points 1 day ago
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

YSK that eating the rich is a nutritious way to redistribute wealth

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t eat shit, mulch the rich.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

Valuable mulch.

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

indeductable!

[–] whimsy@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

Great deduction!

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You allowed this before proper health care because that's Socialism? Communism? Gay?

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

To be fair, America has the best aviation infrastructure in the world, and it is almost entirely socialized. So we do socialism sometimes

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

I like the that term. Just like obese personality for people who need large cars or are excessively loud.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

deduce private jet expenses

I can deduce it right from a receipt, if they give you one.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago

Thank you, government. That is really an improvement of my life!

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ah, and only 90% of gambling losses. Looks like another point against the poor.

Not that I’m condoning gambling, but, weird how those things impact polar opposite sides of the wealth gap.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In my experience, poor people gamble a lot. I've never seen a rich person buy a lottery ticket

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s the point. Poor people gambling can’t write off their losses on taxes. Well, they can, just only up to 90%. Rather than all of it like it has been.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Pretty sure poor people don't have enough money to hire someone who can write off losses

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone can write off stuff on their taxes. It's pretty easy actually.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm always terrified to write stuff off because I fear I will accidentally write something off that I'm not really allowed to due to some obscure legalese and then I will get audited in 5 five years and owe 10 grand in late fees and interest or some shit.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I too get nervous every time I do my taxes but I figure if I'm honest about it they'll forgive most mistakes

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In most countries for average people if you can make a convincing argument about why you thought it would be allowed and can argue it with a straight face they arent interested in nailing you over it because it isnt worth their time.

I asked my accountant "Hey, when I take sick leave at work and I have to get a doctors certificate to get paid for those days, does that make the doctors visit a work expense?"

He said "Thats a legitimate enough argument that if you want me to I'll put them on your return. Dont know if it would pass an audit but the reasoning is solid"

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s not too bad as long as you’re not a dick about it. One year I marked myself as head of household instead of single. I’m not even sure why I did it. I only thought “huh, this saved a lot on my taxes”, and really had no idea what I was doing. They sent back a correction and how much i owed. I paid and that was it. Not scary at all.

Of course in today’s world all about spite and punishment I could imagine it being much worse

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s not hard to file taxes. Especially for an individual, with a normal W2 income, and not much else. Certain people try to make it hard, but it’s not.

I don’t need to pay someone to put a number on a form.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Most poor people probably just take the standard deduction anyway. It's not like they have enough money to accumulate a large amount of deductible expenses anyway. Possible exceptions might be large medical expenses or a mortgage.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

The rest of the world: nah, its insane and difficult that you have to file taxes

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They don't make enough to itemize in the first place, they'll just take the standard deduction. (Unless they lost like $20k on scratchers somehow)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

rich people gamble plenty, they just call it investing and get way more tax write offs for doing so

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, if you buy a 10 dollar scratch card, you can deduct 9 dollars from you income for tax purposes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I am pretty sure this isn’t new. Air travel is like any other business travel expense, and plane are an expense like a plumbers van is..

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago

My plumber's van has two hot stewardesses.

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Literally no one needs a private plane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Plumbers actually need their vans to get their stuff around but for these business people there’s no real reason they can’t fly in a normal plane like everyone else. They can fly fancy, but this whole private plane nonsense is comepletely absurd.

load more comments (1 replies)

Yeah, I was going to say I deducted airplane expenses for a client for twenty years

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

We couldve been a flight based country instead of cars if we went in another direction, when we had more pilots than planes

load more comments
view more: next ›