this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
420 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

18592 readers
2055 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The design drew inspiration from the concept of "a piece of cloth"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 163 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Inspired by the concept of “a piece of cloth,"

Looks at URL.

Born from the idea of creating an additional pocket, its understated design fully encloses iPhone, expanding to fit more of a user’s everyday items.

“The design of iPhone Pocket speaks to the bond between iPhone and its user, while keeping in mind that an Apple product is designed to be universal in aesthetic and versatile in use,” shared Yoshiyuki Miyamae, design director of MIYAKE DESIGN STUDIO

Looks at URL.

When stretched, the open textile subtly reveals its contents and allows users to peek at their iPhone display...

This can't be real. Checks URL again.

Phone Pocket features a singular 3D-knitted construction that is the result of research and development carried out at ISSEY MIYAKE. The design drew inspiration from the concept of “a piece of cloth” and...

iPhone Pocket in the short strap design retails at $149.95 (U.S.), and the long strap design at $229.95 (U.S.).

...What the fuck? This has to be hack or something. There's no way a human being wrote that article, and didn't know what they were doing.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 63 points 1 day ago

it's so stupid I'm still not convinced it's real.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

"This can't be real. Checks URL again."

Dude! I was doing the same thing. I kept thinking, "Is this some new form of prank that hides the url somehow?"

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago

I can’t stop laughing at this comment. I think that’s what we all did!

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 16 points 23 hours ago

I did the same, but also double checked the date to make sure this wasn't some weird April fools that got missed

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 122 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Here I thought it was going to be a small screened cheap iPhone and I was excited for a minute.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (7 children)
[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago

I mean, they have done it. When I was looking at phones a few years back, it was genuinely a toss up between a Pixel 4a and an iPhone SE. If all you need it to be is a cameraphone, then both were good options.

Even now, the iPhone 16e is a relatively inexpensive phone when considering its featureset, but I would prefer a "mini" or newer SE variant instead.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's exactly what I was thinking too. Like an iPhone nano or something. The laugh I let out when I saw what it actually was though, I really needed that today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally, I'm saving up for the "Apple Stick and Bindle", the nouveau-hobo accessory of the season.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought it was going to be a new form factor iPhone that could fit comfortably in your pocket.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago

Why in the hell would they make something people want?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We've come full circle.

collapsed inline media

Also, I wonder if this is some kind of scheme to park the "iPhone Pocket" name for a bit in case they want to make a phone called that in 10 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I've commented on here before how women's clothing generally doesn't have large-enough pockets for smartphones. A lot of modern women's clothing is form-fitting, and has small pockets.

So either you revise the clothing or add some kind of wearable bag/pocket.

Used to be that women wore dresses, had slits in the skirts that they could reach through, and then had sorta wearable pockets on beneath them. But full skirts are pretty dead now, so:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pocket

By the 17th century, pockets were sewn into men's clothing, while women's remained as separate tie-on pouches hidden beneath skirts.[5][6]

In the 17th to 19th centuries, women's tie-on pockets—mentioned in the rhyme Lucy Locket—often carried everyday tools like scissors, pins, needles, and keys.[7][8]: 113 

In modern fashion, men's clothing usually includes pockets, whereas women's clothing often has smaller or even fake ones, sometimes called Potemkin pockets after the concept of a Potemkin village. A 2018 study by the Pudding found that fewer than half of women's front pockets could fit a thin wallet, let alone a phone or keys.[9]

When I first ran into this, I thought "well, put the phone in your purse then, dammit, you're already carrying that for feminine hygiene products". Problem is that women don't haul (bulky) purses everywhere


walk into the office, say, set down the purse at the desk, and it's mostly staying at the desk. I don't know any women who wear their purses around the house. But they do want to keep the phone available all the time.

And the smartphone is a pretty ubiquitous item to want to carry around now.

So unless women's clothing changes to have large pockets and somehow deals with not messing up the body's silhouette or whatever makes that a problem or the smartphone form factor changes ("big smartwatch?"), I expect that people have to wind up with some kind of mini, wearable container. Like this.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, this is a absurdly priced solution, but that's a fair point.

It's stupid fashion's that way. I always thought that when I saw girls sticking phones in their shorts waistbands or whatever.

We should go back to the future:

collapsed inline media40s pants

Or even better, improve it:

collapsed inline mediaAsami Sato's day clothes

And have shorts like that too? I dunno, I'm not a fashion expert, but still.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 42 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Like many, I thought for a microsecond that they actually brought out a phone that will fit in a pocket.

But no, of course they didn't. Because why the fuck would anyone want that.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so sick of this trend of trying to make the phone as thin as possible and then the camera bump has prominent as possible, completely negating any benefit. My partner would definitely like a thinner phone and would probably buy a phone that didn't have the camera bump because it didn't have any camers, if it meant a thinner phone that would actually fit in her pocket.

Either that or keep the camera bump and just thicken the whole phone out and give me a larger battery and the apparently too big to fit 3.5mm audio jack.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Oh God I feel dumber having read this. How is this not the onion?! A 3D knitted construction? Really?

[–] async_amuro@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s the iPod sock of the 2020’s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What a sign of the times. God damn I fucking hate this. Some marketing team gleefully jerking themselves off to it somewhere. Their margins on this have got to be disgustingly high.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago

Profit: $229

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's great! Costs about zero energy to produce, takes money from idiots, what's not to love?!

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

“Never give a sucker an even break”.

The Flimflam man

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 28 points 1 day ago (5 children)

People thinking this is a joke or laughing at this don't seem to remember when Apple released what was essentially a sock for your ipod video. or how about the $1000 monitor stand? or the wheels for your Powermac that cost hundreds of dollars.

This is Apple folks. If they can find a way to nickle and dime their gullible cultish user base they will do it. They've been doing it since...well since the company was founded.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 27 points 1 day ago

It looks like the bathing suit that Borat wore to the beach.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love this. This is perfect for Apple people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 22 points 23 hours ago (10 children)

Honest question, how do you Apple fans keep supporting this company?

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 12 points 20 hours ago (12 children)

Well, not a fan, exactly, but I am forced to be fully engulfed in the apple ecosystem.

I don’t hate them more than Dell, Asus, Sony, or Microsoft. Not everything they make is a ripoff.

  • the $10 A/D converter in the headphone adapters is a steal
  • the mac mini with base config is a good deal
  • the macbook air is worth the money and best in class
  • ipad — no worthy competition for most users
  • M-series chips and their energy consumption
  • savvy users avoid all the upsell ripoffs like storage upgrades and displays and sock slings
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 21 points 19 hours ago

So, a knee-high sock with a slit on the side. For $230 US.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

does it bother apple that it is compatible with all other phone brands?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Probably not. Can you imagine someone with a non-Apple phone not being willing to buy an iPhone, but being willing to buy one of those?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

I cannot imagine anyone getting that phone cumsock to parade around

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So a typical cross body bag?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

No. Those can be useful. This can only hold your phone.

[–] AntEater@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Many years back, I kept my ipod classic in an old sock to protect it while it banged around inside my bag. My buddy made fun of me for it, little did he know that my sense of fashion was just far ahead of its time.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Tangentially related. I used to go out on boats a bunch meant years ago. Lost a moto Razer when they were still kinda new. Was bummed, but learned. So I bought what at the time was a kinda nice Nokia(one of the first bar phones with blue tooth) and put it in a condom and tied it off. Could still use it fairly normally, and there was enough air to keep it floating the few times it fell in. Caught on with some of my cohorts, others got a very expensive lesson in laughing at me.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How are we getting so dumb? Worst of all, notoriously dumb. A bit of "under the surface stupidity" is tolerable, however, we're well beyond the rubicon of stupid.

The boomers were on to something when they called us "darn idiots".

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 12 hours ago

Apple users are so fucking stupid.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

A literal fucking pocket, as I expected. SMDH

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's pathetic that they ~~couldn't~~ refused to offer more than a handful of colors for their "piece of cloth". And "3D-knitted construction"? Fuck off.

Also, that thing looks like a pickpocket's wet dream.

[–] Bunbury@feddit.nl 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some people might find this shocking…. But a lot of knitting is already 3D. It’s not a very novel concept.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RickyWars@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

checks date

not April 1st

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

A sock with straps for ONLY $229.95!

They know exactly how to price products for the Apple gang, any cheaper and no one would buy.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

Over two ton for something you could get your abuela to knit you for next to nowt.

[–] BigMilk13@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

It'll just make idiots even more identifiable

load more comments
view more: next ›