this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
304 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26239 readers
2561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA) walked back remarks Sunday he made to CNN’s Manu Raju in which he said Democratic lawmakers were acting like “a terrorist,” suggesting he misspoke when using the highly-charged term.

“Why not work with Democrats right now, try to cut a deal and reopen the government?” Raju asked McCormick.

McCormick bluntly responded by saying that the “main reason” he and his Republican colleagues couldn’t negotiate with Democratic lawmakers was because “you can’t negotiate with a terrorist.”

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 172 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's amazing the lengths the Republicans will go to just to make it harder for poor people to get healthcare.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 56 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I think you could win a lot of elections in the US right now with the campaign strategy of just repeating this into a microphone over and over again.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 30 points 6 days ago

Maybe, maybe not; Republicans have already made it next to impossible for the poor to vote, and have done a bang up job at distracting everyone else from paying any attention to the poor and needy.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 6 days ago

One of the problems is some poor people (eg: many whites) would rather die than other poor people (eg: black folks) get anything at all.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Except that you'd have to survive the DNC/establishment Democrats' attempts to sabotage your entire campaign.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

Oh, you mean free positive PR from my enemies targeted at my voters?

Sure, pile it on!

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 13 points 6 days ago

It could be argued that healthy food and water is healthcare

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This guy's been on the job less than a year and he's already a full-blown moron. Probably a big supporter of Jan 6th, too. Trump supports terrorism and let many criminals out of jail. Who's the real terrorist and terrorist sympathizer?

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They're doing exactly the same thing Republicans did every year whilst Biden and Obama were in charge.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 11 points 6 days ago

Theyre also doing it for the good of the people, rather than… (checks notes) preventing the most milquetoast centrist motherfucker of all time from being on the Supreme Court

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 11 points 6 days ago

Horse left the barn.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

As if they would negotiate at all...

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 7 points 6 days ago

Honestly I could probably make an argument that just about every American politician currently has voted “yes” to some foreign act or policy that I could reasonably describe as terrorism at this point.

But I don’t think this moron and I would see eye to eye on this and I do not think this is what he was talking about.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

While I don't really expect things to get dramatically better, I do know there's going to be a massive shift in the "weather" with Trump's sinking popularity and/or advanced age and looming demise, and when that happens, it will be like every MAGA nutcase disappeared overnight, and you won't be able to find a single person who supported any of it, like by magic.

Except for every single Republican who has just been riding the Trump-Train to Fascistville and have the most rotten, brain-dead, malicious statements on record and will have to dance and jig their way out of the history books now that daddy isn't around to protect them.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social -5 points 6 days ago

I remember 911 when al kiada was trying to get universal healthcare for the american people. despicable. or uh. maybe it was due to religion or things like what we are currently doing in venezuela. so hard to tell.