this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
171 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

72971 readers
2967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 40 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Seems a bit of a publicity stunt as there must be a better way to do this than to drop logistics on to human subways? That being said inner city delivery bots are great idea. I'd see them all the time in Estonia a few years ago and food delivery should be entirely automated.

[–] MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

Estonia's delivery bots were a game changer - they reduced last-mile delivery costs by almost 40% in urban areas and had surprisingly good weather adaptibility, even in snow (though they did get stuck somtimes lol).

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

No it's "disruption", just offload all your delivery costs onto public mass transit infrastructure and fill up the subway cars with deliveries instead of people. Profit.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Tbf all delivery methods use public infrastructure.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay I guess I could phrase that better but this is the first time they've used public mass transit infrastructure that I've heard of. I will edit my comment to include the phrase "mass transit".

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Yeah tbh that's kinda bad. I dont wan't delivery trucks in my subway

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Meh, I think I like the idea of 1 truck pulling up to a docking bay, them all driving out the back and hopping on the mostly empty cars in slow times that are already going to the subway platforms where the deliveries need to go. It's either that or having to go through every subway entry point to drop them off. I think this will get flack because people are anti automation, but if it was people pushing carts to restock them manually I would still prefer them all getting in one vehicle to the subway and all getting on there and hopping off 1 at each stop. The product is all coming from one source, so why have 43 routes from place to sub station and then 43 routes back. If it is actually busy enough that it is holding up entry somewhere, having it in one location and streamlining it sounds nicer as well. It's not like the people can bring carts through turnstyles anyways, so they are already entering through a designated entry if the 7-11's are on the platforms. (They might not be, they could be elsewhere, but the article says downstairs).

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 10 points 17 hours ago

Dozens of squat delivery robots have now begun riding subway trains across the network during off-peak hours, exiting at each station where a 7-Eleven is located to make deliveries, according to a report by local news outlet SZNews.

“In the past, delivery workers had to park above ground, unload goods, and manually push them into subway stations,” Li Yanyan, a manager at one of the 7-Eleven stores involved in the project, told SZNews. “Now, with robots, it’s much easier and more convenient.”

I think this is only for 7/11s that are part of the underground subway architecture? I don't think the robots would be cost effective compared to a truck if this was for restocking any old corner store.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago

Those Starship drones are cute as hell

[–] rimu@piefed.social 27 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

more than 1,600 robotics companies.

In one city. Christ.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 13 hours ago

Shenzhen is huge and has an absurd amount of tech companies, so this doesn't really surprise me.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 11 hours ago

the city is in key national focus for prototyping modernization and creating a smart city.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

China's government is handing out massive subsidies for everything called robotics. This causes the number of companies that claim to do robotics to be inflated

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Same here in the US with AI, but instead of the government giving subsidies its venture capitalists.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

industries tend to be more centralized in China. It's not that that's indicative of every city, more that Shenzhen already has easy access to the kind of manufacturing and products that a robotics company would find ideal.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

It must be easy to start a business there

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 15 points 17 hours ago

new copper golems be looking plastic

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

If the bots are required to have paid transit passes and if they're confined to off-peak hours when the subways aren't full anyway, this could actually be a net win for mass transit: they're putting money into the system while consuming relatively few resources, so the bots can fund improvements that benefit humans.

Yeah. Just need to make sure that sensible restrictions are in place to prevent the creep into turning a public service into primarily a commercial one. Starts out only running during off hours, then running during active hours at a reduced rate, then it's got dedicated cars for the robots, then it overflows into passenger cars... you see where it's going. Best to set up guard rails before it's a problem.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Good point. If trains are empty might as well use them.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

They look like oversized iMacs on wheeled platforms.

[–] romantired@shibanu.app 2 points 1 hour ago

China is awesome

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Regardless of whether or not it's truly happening, can you say "Dystopia"?

Regardless of what country does it, I will absolutely call every country that replaces all humans with robo workers for mundane jobs like that dystopian.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 11 hours ago

I think all jobs that are able to be replaced by robots should be replaced, the dystopian factor is how capitalism deprives people of the ability to exist in doing so.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago

I'd call every society where the concept of a job still exists a dystopia.

We have the tools to start moving past that, question is how can you bridge the period in between.