this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
337 points (98.0% liked)

News

31049 readers
3095 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has sued Rupert Murdoch and two Wall Street Journal newspaper reporters for libel and slander over claims that he sent sex offender Jeffrey Epstein a bawdy note and sketch of a naked woman.

Trump’s lawsuit on Friday, which also targets Dow Jones and News Corp, was filed in the southern district of Florida federal court in Miami.

It came after the Journal reported on a 50th birthday greeting that Trump allegedly sent to Epstein in 2003 that included a sexually suggestive drawing and reference to secrets they shared. It was reportedly a contribution to a birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 117 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago

Lmao love it

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 107 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

No. Stop. Don't.

Pretty sure this would mean an actual copy of the letter, if it exists, will have to be entered into evidence.

[–] Steve@communick.news 22 points 20 hours ago

Only if they don't settle out of court.
I can't imagine trump wants this to go to a court room.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

Lol you have much more faith in our justice system than I do.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They can order the publisher to provide it? I don't know but I would think so.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 2 points 7 hours ago

In fact they can but journalists tend to protect their sources so courts don't often challenge them this way. But it happens.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 45 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't one of the justifications for giving the President blanket immunity was that his job is too important to have him distracted by a court case?

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 41 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't a court case, it's a shakedown.

[–] Almonds@mander.xyz 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It would be genuinely funny if the man who has nearly 3x the reported wealth of Trump, and who also owns the media empire that fueled Trump's political rise, loses here

Although, I wasn't expecting Musk to get spanked so quickly, so maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about xD

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Depends if Murdoch actually cares about proving the journalistic integrity of the WSJ or appeasing Trump who's FCC could pull broadcasting licenses even if Murdoch wins.

My guess is Murdoch settles and and the WSJ prints a front page retraction.

[–] Almonds@mander.xyz 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think you have an excellent point about the FCC, and if anything that aspect will be an interesting thing to keep an eye on. Because even my grandmother, who is a few years younger than Murdoch, watches Fox on YouTube now

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

FCC doesn't have control over cable shows or Youtube replays.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Well, maybe not legally.

[–] Almonds@mander.xyz 1 points 18 hours ago

Yes, that's why I mentioned YouTube, because AFAIK they currently can't dictate what is streamed online.

I'm not sure what the recent Net Neutrality strike means in this regard though. In March of this year the FCC commissioner stated he wanted control over YouTube TV

[–] tal@lemmy.today 33 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think that Trump comes out ahead in any legal battle. Even if he's in the legal right, which I seriously doubt


now you've got a huge, high-profile feud going on with the guy that owns a large chunk of the right wing media out there. I mean, you're gonna lose in the court of public opinion.

And the standard for defamation specifically in US courts specifically for public figures is very high. Like, let's even say that the report was in error (which I also kinda doubt). To win a defamation case in the US, the defamation has to be intentionally false, done with the intent of causing harm, and a collection of other things that are gonna be hard to win on.

And if you lose, now the news headline is "Trump loses/abandons case against News Media X over his involvement in sexy stuff with Epstein".

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 20 hours ago

He doth protest too much. He may not have drawn the picture, but he definitely signed it. Either way, no good because he approved of its message.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Game of chicken. If they don't settle, Trump will pull out before he can be deposed. Of course there is a greater than zero chance that he is so far gone he doesn't actually remember his little love letter.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm shocked he has any children at all (for a variety of reasons) with pull-out game like his. My best guess is that half-pump chump Trump lost his balance at the critical moment of entry and, from those four occasions, life was made. Five occasions, I forgot one but to be fair, so does he.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

from those four occasions

But what about Tiffany

Five occasions, I forgot one but to be fair, so does he.

Well played.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago

Somehow I don't think this will help bury the Epstein story

[–] BubbaGumpsBackLumps@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The funniest part of this i find is had the stupid cunt just not became president, he could have avoided all this and spent the rest of his days cheating at golf, but no the fragile little bitch had to go get his feelings hurt by Obama and his ego could just not let it go

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

In all fairness, he's made heaps of cash this time around, and written his name in history.

Which is the most important thing for a narcissist.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Yes! Burn all your bridges with your few friends you have left! Then you will be left all alone on an island, a sex island. Oh shit wait!…

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 16 hours ago

This should be entertaining. I want them to go to discovery. We need Trump describe under oath hit relationship. Present day Trump

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

It's never going to get to discovery I don't know what y'all are expecting. This is Rupert Murdoch. He's just going to use this as an excuse to give a giant payout to Trump.

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

Exactly, he's using lawsuits as avenues for bribes.

[–] AndrewSB49@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

He's killed that story completely now.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 3 points 8 hours ago

Southern District of Florida Federal Court in Miami - is that I-Lean Qannon’s jurisdiction?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 0 points 18 hours ago

Old money vs Orange turd money? Who will w....care. Hey look a squirrel!

[–] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 0 points 19 hours ago

Who’s he suing because of those ankles?