this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
164 points (98.8% liked)
Linux
10489 readers
627 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I guess this is an honest opinion
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29528343
There's probably no big reason. It's just that text is printed much faster. There's no huge gain, especially for general usage and most use cases. But why not? Why shouldn't you use the gpu if you have one?
If gpu would've been first, you'd wonder why you should use cpu if it's slower. Faster is always(?) better and I as a user don't really care if it is wayland or x11, why should I care about gpu or cpu? It just sounds great, but under the hood, it's just a marketing stunt.
It's nice to have but I just don't care. Like if earbuds last 6 or 8 hours. They charge within 5 or 10 minutes, why should I care? Or like losless audio. My headphones can't play it, and more important I can't hear a difference. It's nice, I'll take it, but I don't care about it.