this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
665 points (99.7% liked)

News

33337 readers
2682 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The wholesaler is the latest company to file a lawsuit against a federal agency over the president's signature economic policy.

Costco Wholesale has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, asking the Court of International Trade to consider all tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act unlawful.

The company said in a Nov. 28 filing that it is seeking a “full refund” of all IEEPA duties paid as a result of Donald Trump's executive order which imposed what he called "reciprocal" tariffs.

“Because IEEPA does not clearly authorize the President to set tariffs...the Challenged Tariff Orders cannot stand and the defendants are not authorized to implement and collect them,” Costco's lawyer writes in the lawsuit.

Global cosmetics giant Revlon, eyeglass maker EssilorLuxottica, motorcycle manufacturer Kawasaki, canned foods seller Bumble Bee, Japanese auto supplier Yokohama Tire and many smaller firms have also filed similar suits

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hdsrob@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Same here. We sold several computer systems at our original quoted price, and just ate the price increase from our vendors.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

What do you think quoted price means…? That’s the risk you take when you quote stuff and prices change within the time they accept it.

Lots of material goods change prices daily.

Not holding up your original quoted price is how you lose business and your business in general. You seem to think that you can just choose to not hold up your end of the agreed upon contract? Yikes.

But hey, such a good business doing what you originally agreed to!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between lamenting the reality of honoring a quote after things change and wishing you didn't need to. They're saying they wish the government would pay them back for the tariff, not that they wish they could've passed it on to the customer.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works -4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

So they want the government to fix a regular issue with quoted work…? The price is expected to change, that’s why you quote to begin with…. It’s likely they don’t even know how their system works.

That’s even worse lmfao.

It’s quoted work, it’s volatile already, and the customers game it if they know the material goods in going down. Don’t like it? Don't quote work. It’s not even a relevant detail to their gripe, just bitching for the sake of bitching at this point.

The price would be different with or without tariffs, but complain without realizing how the system works I guess.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 13 hours ago

Going through my past three days of comments and down voting them all doesn't help your argument.

collapsed inline media

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't just saying "wahhh government, pwease pay the difference of this quote" they're specifically replying to a thread about a company suing the government for tariff reimbursements and talking about a tariff making the price go up after the quote.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works -2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Did you miss the detail about the VENDOR increasing price? Their build cost went up, not the price. This would happened irregardless of tariffs, and is expected.

I guess if you ignore details they specify, you could take that from their comment.

But again, person is just bitching for the sake of bitching, the provided details show they either don’t understand how the system work, or just bitching.

They want to applauded for doing what they agreed to, it’s bloody laughable. As a small business owner myself it’s attitudes like this that make the rest look bad.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

As a small business owner myself it’s attitudes like this that make the rest look bad.

After going through three days of my comments to down vote them all, you don't need help making yourself look bad. You handled that quite well yourself.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works -5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, downvote a couple stupid comments you’ve made and suddenly I went through “days”.

How petty and sad is it that you even went and looked lol?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

How petty and sad is it that you even went and looked

Coming from the person who just admitted to going through days of my comments to down vote them.

Also, for those watching from home, it was over a dozen comments. Not "a couple."

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

lol, seriously? Do you check your comments religiously to see how they are being voted on? This has to be the saddest thing I’ve seen online in long while.

Mind you, from your comments we can see that you’re just an incredibly aggressive person and frequently get downvoted. So of course you would want to know who it is and harass them.

You’re exactly the reason public logs are an issue. You think every thing is a slight against you. Don’t say stupid shit, don’t get downvoted, what a shocker.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

lol, seriously? Do you check your comments religiously to see how they are being voted on? This has to be the saddest thing I’ve seen online in long while.

It's very funny to me that you do something petty and get caught, and your only defense is "oh yeah? Well it's actually sad that you noticed I did this."

Mind you, from your comments we can see that you’re just an incredibly aggressive person and frequently get downvoted. So of course you would want to know who it is and harass them.

The passive aggressive thing going on is harassing me by down voting all my posts. You're just upset that you got caught.

You’re exactly the reason public logs are an issue. You think every thing is a slight against you. Don’t say stupid shit, don’t get downvoted, what a shocker.

Obviously you think public logs are a problem because you got caught being petty and passive aggressive.