politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I'm a little tired of pretending people just don't understand what is going on. Conservatives are fucking liars. They lie about their beliefs. They lie about their understanding. They feign ignorance at the horror and buy into nakedly fake conspiracy theories and artificially generated images/videos. To quote Upton Sinclair
The common denominator across the conservative movement is industry of employment. O&G, FinTech, Sales, Real Estate, Automotive, MLMs... If you find a staunch conservative pundit, you're going to quickly discover one or more of the above puffing up their financial sails.
Religious Right figures know full well that their religious leadership differs from their political leadership and they don't care. Their dioceses are funded with the money from extractive and exploitative industries. Their churches are built with blood money. And they're going to defend that money far more zealously than they defend some random asshole from Chicago promoted to the highest office via a conclave of foreign fucks most of them couldn't pick out of a crowd in full uniform.
It isn't dissonance. Its a pronounced divorce between the local churches and Rome that's been widening since Vatican II. As Catholicism spreads across the developing world and shrivels in the imperial core, the so-called Catholics find their economic future and their religious faith at odds. And they aren't flinching in response. They're going all in on the money.
I think there is a bit of cultural narcissism underpinning it all. It's the mindset that they are the special ones chosen for preferred treatment by the omnipotent ruler of the universe. No matter the issue, we're the good ones and the other guy is bad, and leopards won't eat our faces. It's only when the cruel grifters they've voted into power casually do something that directly harms them do they begin to wonder if something might be wrong, but they assume it must be some oversight or unintentional error. "My exalted master, President Trump. You've deported my wife and sent my children to a Nicaraguan gulag, and I'm thinking that there must be some sort of error. We've followed all the rules, and hate everyone you hate. Surely we're 'the good ones,' right? Right!?!"
There are lots of modern examples of "Jews for Hitler", that's for sure.
If things get bad enough, I'm sure even the very monied class but that are one the "wrong" side of some kind of sorting - including people like Thiel - will find themselves on the other end of that gun and they will be the most Pikachu-faced if it happens. Again, they apparently learned nothing from history. I'm sure the well-heeled Jews under Hitler thought their money would protect them, too.
Thiel is gay and I'm more than sure that a mobbed-up government that is pointed at him would be more than happy to seize all his assets, redistribute to the "worthy" people, and throw him in prison. Doesn't matter if he identifies as a billionaire and has weird xtian beliefs that match with "maga" (whatever the fuck that term means - it's just baby-talk, and I have a feeling that just like fascism, it doesn't really have much of an ideology for a reason. It means whatever the current cult leaders says it means).
The analogy I've always heard is "living inside the fence" versus "outside the fence". And how your perceived position shapes how you behave politically.
But I also see this painfully naive assumption that Democrats are actually for looser immigration policy or that a democratic administration won't end in your wife/kids getting the old heave hoe.
In the end, it's just two Have Nots arguing which plutocrat would trickle down on them better. There's no reason to vote for Trump, but no reason to vote against him either. Doubley so when you realize your vote isn't even impacting the election's outcome.
If every Republican had a crystal ball and could know with perfect certainty whether their immediate family would suffer from Trump's immigration policy... he would still be president today. The margins were too wide and the deck was too stacked.