this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
182 points (97.4% liked)

Europe

7832 readers
992 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

Nato is considering being “more aggressive” in responding to Russia’s cyber attacks, sabotage and airspace violations, according to the alliance’s most senior military officer.

Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone told the Financial Times that the western military alliance was looking at stepping up its response to hybrid warfare from Moscow.

“We are studying everything . . . On cyber, we are kind of reactive. Being more aggressive or being proactive instead of reactive is something that we are thinking about,” said Dragone, who is chair of Nato’s military committee.

Europe has been hit by numerous hybrid war incidents — some attributed to Russia and others unclear — from the cutting of cables in the Baltic Sea to cyber attacks across the continent.

...

Dragone said that a “pre-emptive strike” could be considered a “defensive action”, but added: “It is further away from our normal way of thinking and behaviour.”

...

A Baltic diplomat said: “If all we do is continue being reactive, we just invite Russia to keep trying, keep hurting us. Especially when hybrid warfare is asymmetric — it costs them little, and us a lot. We need to try to be more inventive.”

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I already told you that I'm not interested in this discussion.

Then why tf did you ask the question? You asked I answered. Or did you forget that you asked? That would explain a lot.

Show me the Russian tanks crossing an EU border.

Ukraine is full of Russian tanks.

Russia is also waging a hybrid warfare against NATO members, just read my previous comments, since you clearly haven't.

You're peddling talking points by western nations to convince people that Russia is definetly going to invade.

And how exactly does it help the west? I explained how your propaganda helps Russians.

Facts are that Russia is more and more aggressive towards Europe waging hybrid warfare. Trump is Putin's lackey. So what options does EU have to defend themselves?

Wait until Russian tanks attack and then start thinking about how to defend themselves?

Holy shit, you're embarrassing. Your level of geopolitical competence is on the level of a literal school child.

Empty claims. Did you even go to school? Do you know how debating works? Did no one teach you to provide arguments for your claims?

I'm pretty sure that kind of insult is against the rules. Reporting you...

Oooooh I am so scared of this russian bot. Go ahead, since you clearly have no valid arguments to defend your propagandist views, this is your only chance to feel like you've won and get my comments dismantling your propaganda deleted.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ukraine is full of Russian tanks.

Ukraine is not in the EU. The common narrative is that Russia will invade Poland, the Baltic states or even central Europe. I don't believe that narrative. That doesn't make me a russian propagandist.

Russia is also waging a hybrid warfare against NATO members

You mean that wikipedia article full of allegations? The one that also mentions the attacks on nordstream which were probably done by Ukraine?

I don't care enough for your tone to look up what you wrote. Russia has no interest in invading the EU, then.

And how exactly does it help the west?

Makes the population prepared for war with Russia.

Facts are that Russia is more and more aggressive towards Europe waging hybrid warfare.

Most of those are allegations. It can also be seen as retaliation against economic warfare. And I was referring to attack as in military warfare.

So what options does EU have to defend themselves?

Europe can "defend itself" well enough already. Also: Europe's defense is not my concern. Europe's interests are different from mine.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I’d just be someone who’d be forced to fight in that war.

Also: Europe’s defense is not my concern. Europe’s interests are different from mine.

Pick a fucking lane, you nonce.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 22 hours ago

i've agreed with this poster on a great many things in the past, and this seems to be them hyperfixating on the NATO chief's weird word choice. russia has been performing probing incursions into NATO member territories for months. they have been documented engaging in hybrid warfare as far west in the eurozone as Germany. this is not a pre-emptive strike. this is responding to russian violations of international law with limp wrists