this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
478 points (94.1% liked)

memes

18185 readers
2305 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, for most parents, measuring age in months ends right around the one year mark. For obvious reasons.

That and there's no way the kid in this cartoon is 32 months. That's 2 years, 8 months. Walking and talking and likely ~15kg. While not impossible, that would be pretty hard to yeet up to 16.4 mph.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

I do! I had figured out the amount of force required to throw a 15kg child over a 0.5s throw up to 7.33 m/s (16.4 mph) at ~220 Newtons, but then I figured that information wasn't particularly useful to anyone really, so I just left it out.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, for most parents, measuring age in months ends right around the one year mark.

I know plenty of parents who refer to their kid in months through year two, as you're hitting milestones every month or two (vaccines, physical/psychological development, age limit for certain pharmaceuticals, etc) and "2 years" is such a big milestone for them all.

Also, kids who are premature make things extra complicated. I still refer to my son as "13-months adjusted" because if I said "16-months" people would wonder why he was so small.

[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

While I agree with you, I also have to say that a significant percentage of people have no idea of the size difference between 13 and 16 months, and that saying 13 months adjusted is a little silly, but fun! So you do you.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

people have no idea of the size difference between 13 and 16 months

People with their own children notice the difference more readily

[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 1 points 52 minutes ago

People with kids at those ages definitely. Anecdotally, mine's more grown up now, and I don't remember how big she was at those ages.

I do remember searching a whole lot of XX-month-milestone on the Internet when she was small.