this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
119 points (80.5% liked)
Linux
10342 readers
443 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I refuse to watch a video with Linus Sebastian. I'll get better tech advice from my cat tripping on catnip.
Do you mean buying computers worth thousands of dollars doesn't make you a computer expert? I'm shocked. Shocked!
You know, I was fine with LTT for a while (many years ago). I knew they were clowns, but they seemed genuine and well intentioned. Their first Linux challenge made me raise my eyebrows at them, because I was a long time Linux user and knew much of what they said was either off the mark or disingenuous.
Then their storage server video came out and I almost fell off my chair with the levels of bafoonery I had watched. Even the real experts that helped them out had a hard time keeping their words civil while discussing the postmortem of the situation. That's when I lost respect for LTT and Linus Sebastian as a tech "expert".
Then all the other stuff about the lies, the made up metrics, the years of garbage test data from negligent and lazy practices, and the cherry on top which was the Billet Labs thing. The arrogance of Linus Sebastian to do the test in bad faith on a GPU that was explicitly stated by Billet Labs to not be the target device, and then Linus whine on the WAAAH Show that it would cost him too much money to do a proper retest, and then just selling off the prototype. Then doubling down twice in a forum post that LINUS SEBASTIAN is somehow the victim in all of this! Poor Poor Linus Sebastian.
And the moron couldn't even do an apology video without making some wise-ass joke. Couldn't read the room the one time he needed to do it.
He's just an ass-hat.
He's also vocally anti-labor organization and anti-union.
Arguably he's also pro workplace sexual harassment, but hey, he made an apology video so that's no big deal.
I hear this all the time but people who say this can never seem to find a source for it. What he has said is that if his employees felt like they needed to form a union, then he would have failed as an employer. He's gone on the record as pro-union many times.
This one though, that's new. I don't suppose you have a source for that one either?
https://indiecator.org/2023/08/18/the-problem-with-linus-tech-tips-part-2-a-toxic-work-environment-sexism-assault-and-sexual-harassment/
That's an entire post about nothing but the testimony of a single employee.
And 8 months later the results of the investigation were posted here:
https://xcancel.com/LinusTech/status/1793428629378208057
And? A firm you paid found nothing. Big shock.
But actually, these things boil down to he said, she said, and most of the employees involved have left th company. Not really much to investigate
This is a standard anti-union line. It aims to maintain a union-free status quo. Employees in a non-coop union-free workplace have very little leverage to get more of the profits they generate. The workplace environment might be alright, employees might be paid alright. That doesn't mean they're paid fairly for the value they create. When there's no union, employee pay is set by the labour market, regardless of how much value they create for the employer. If an employee creates 10x what they're paid and they ask for triple pay, their employer would say there's another candidate to take their place, that it would be a bit of hassle to train so they'd give the employee some marginal raise, to not deal with that. A union on the other hand creates the negotiating leverage to get much more of the value employees create, by threatening a significant financial and reputational loss for the employer. Linua doesn't want that. Most employers don't.
I mean, it may be, combined with other anti-union sentiments. It's also completely fucking true.
I understand how unions work but thank you for the mansplanation.
Untrue on both counts, but I’d love to see a source that proves me wrong
You realize that most of us here have watched plenty of LTT content, right?
I don't know if you would call it a regular occurrence, but on more than a few videos I've watched he has made explicitly anti-union comments, including saying that organized labor is unnecessary.
And looking at your comment history, you're an avid LTT viewer, so you already knew that.
Burden of proof is on the accuser.
I can’t prove a negative, but he has stated multiple times that he is pro union.
Additionally, the 3rd party law firm that investigated the ex employee’s claims against LMG (the company) found that:
You should also note that the former employee never accused Linus Sebastian (the individual) of being a sex pest. Certain people lie about this constantly on the internet, and others believe it is true without verifying the facts
Having seen multiple videos of him ranting about unions, I find your claim laughable.
But wow, I wasn't aware that a law firm they paid said they did nothing wrong, that changes everything.
I‘ve watched a lot of LTT and WAN show. I do not recall him ever speaking out against unions. He only ever said, he‘d see it as a personal failure as an employer, if his employees felt the need to unionise. He wouldn’t try to stop them if they did though.
Yeah, I guess the accuser really should have been the one to pay tens of thousands to a third party right?
I’m fairly sure that nothing could change your mind at this point, but by all means keep spreading your misinformation.
Parasocial relationships are wild.
ad hominem much?
We investigated ourselves, and found nothing wrong.
Oh I'm sorry, let me fix that:
We paid someone to investigate us, and once our payment cleared, they found nothing wrong.
What alternative was there? This is such a disingenuous take.
You just claimed Linus was pro-union, when all of us have watched the videos of him ranting about his distain for unions and saying they're unnecessary.
Forgive me if I don't take your critique at face value.
Show me the proof where he said he is anti-union.
Dude, get real.
Do you think I saved the video titles and timestamps for his anti-union comments?
I watched his content religiously for years, and it looks like you still do, which means I know you're lying.
But I definitely don't care enough about this to spend the next 8 hours digging through his old videos to find the various clips just to prove it to you on Lemmy.
Tell you what though, if you go find me proof of his pro-union stance, I'll be happy to take that into consideration.
For all anyone knows reading your comments you are either fabricating or twisting something said to fit your narrative. If you can’t or won’t find a source for your claims, that is totally fine, but I’m calling bs on those claims.
Does that also apply to your claims that he's pro-union?
Yeah, burden of proof is on me there.
If I felt like this was a genuine discussion, I might try to dig up clips of him talking about it, but at this point I feel like I’d just be talking to a wall.
You probably would be, because again, I have seen him on multiple different videos making anti-union comments.
But, depending on how vocally he was supportive of unions in any clips you showed, I could be persuaded to think better of him.
But it would be insane for you to spend hours of your life digging them up for that purpose, which is good for you because I don't think they even exist, so I'm giving you an out to pretend that they do.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=EwgZaSYuBLc&t=8458s&pp=2AGKQpACAQ%3D%3D
Found via: https://whenplane.com/search
11 hours of silence after this one lol, I guess even with proof they just didn't want to change their mind
Or they are busy or they dont feel like they have anything more to say
I've found many people don't feel like they have anything more to say after being proven wrong, so fair enough
The playbook is generally to move the goalposts afterwards, but I’ve been surprised on Lemmy before so who knows? It takes a lot more energy to refute someone’s claims than it does to make them, so if a discussion is happening in bad faith it’s really not worth having.
The burden of proof is on the party making a positive claim. This is true when in a debate, or maybe a professional setting.
But this is the internet. No one owes you anything here, besides, Linus Sebastian's statements are generally known. And often he directly contradicts himself from show to show.
Apparently not based on your comments. Another explanation is that certain individuals know the facts, but twist the truth in an effort to manipulate others.
Ah. You're that guy I'd been expecting to hit this thread. Ya know you can still like his content without trying to tell other people they are completely wrong about a thing they've clearly thought about more than a little.
Other than attacking me, what is the point of you commenting?
That "attack" was actually a gentle suggestion. You can just like LTT. You can ignore all the people who don't.
Thanks for summarizing all that. I knew most of it but forgot some of those details. He is an asshat indeed. I've been saying that for a couple years. Somehow every time I comment about him online multiple people jump in to say he did nothing wrong. Surprised that's not happened here yet honestly.
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
I watch it for the same reason I watch William Osman. They do a lot of fun bullshit videos like trying to watercool a server rack with a swimming pool.
Then don't watch it I guess
I don't really see a reason to announce it here
Virtue signalling is very important to some people.
It's more about making aware those unaware how much of a clown Linus Sectarian, and the people at LMG/LTT are.
You're so quirky and different!
I'm more concerned about the sexual harassment.
Are you referring to the sexual harassment claim that was alleged to have happened via another employee, but never substantiated?
Yes, and I appreciate that you pressed the issue because I never heard what ultimately transpired, since I never really cared for the channel before that. But I see they hired a 3rd party to investigate and the conclusion was that none of the allegations were substantiated. Though I haven't found any mention of a further response from the employee that made the allegations.