this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
204 points (95.1% liked)

Science

5590 readers
437 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Study

The researchers discovered that once a tattoo is made, the ink rapidly travels through the lymphatic system and, within hours, accumulates in large quantities in the lymph nodes — key organs of the body’s defense system. Inside these nodes, immune cells called macrophages actively capture all types of pigment. This ink uptake triggers an inflammatory response with two phases: an acute phase lasting about two days after tattooing, followed by a chronic phase that can persist for years. The chronic phase is particularly concerning because it weakens the immune system, potentially increasing the susceptibility to infections and cancer. The study also showed that macrophages cannot break down the ink like they would other pathogens, wich causes them to die, especially with red and black inks, suggesting these colors may be more toxic. As a result, ink remains trapped in the lymph nodes in a continuous cycle of capture and cell death, gradually affecting the immune system’s defensive capacity.

The study found that tattooed mice produced significantly lower levels of antibodies after vaccination. This effect is likely due to the impaired function of immune cells that remain associated with tattoo ink for long periods. Similarly, human immune cells previously exposed to ink also showed a weakened response to vaccination.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Human subjects are crazy to work with for a few reasons

  1. People don’t follow instructions perfectly
  2. Research subjects often don’t take the research project very seriously.
  3. It’s not uncommon to have dropouts, thus you either have to find more subjects or have less data.
  4. It’s impossible to know what the subjects are doing to cause data variability (diet, vices, etc)
  5. You can’t lock subjects in a room and force them to eat and drink the same food every day.
  6. There’s a financial (time) penalty to many research studies that can get in the way of enthusiastic participation.

Laboratory mice literally live 5 to a cage with almost no diet variability, in a controlled environment. Yes shit does happen with research mice, but it’s something that is easy to control overall.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 hours ago

And yet, we manage to have hundreds of thousands of studies written about humans with human subjects. This sounds like a boatload of excuses that could be summed up as "science is hard". Sure, it's hard, but it's better than putting out a flawed study that can't scale properly.