this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
463 points (98.3% liked)

Selfhosted

53204 readers
2197 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Plex is starting to enforce its new rules, which prevent users from remotely accessing a personal media server without a subscription fee.

If anyone needs it: https://jellyfin.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 103 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I set up Plex on my mum's TV and she can just push play. The UI is intuitive (read: familiar) to her.

Jellyfin has a reputation for giving users more control and customizability, but the other side of that coin is that it's more "fiddly".

My users don't want to fiddle.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's the opposite of my experience. Jellyfin just works and immediately exposes the content we're looking for, plex tries overloading you with bullshit and burying your actual content

[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe you. I feel that way about iTunes (trauma intensifies).

But Jellyfin doesn't have that reputation.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are you seriously telling us you reading from three reddit threads from almost a decade ago and consider that "reputation"?

[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I am beginning to remember what made me think Jellyfin wasn't user friendly.

Maybe it wasn't the user interface after all.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

For remote streaming to, say, your mum's house? (Or a friend, etc)?

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, after I set up the server properly (reverse proxy). With this change the same setup on the server side is necessary for remote streaming with free Plex.

My mum puts in the domain, username and password and starts streaming.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

…reverse proxy…

Guess what I didn’t have to setup with Plex or Emby.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 4 points 12 hours ago

That's because you had somone elses servers doing that part for you.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I set up Jellyfin on my mother-in-law's TV, it's just push play.

My mum has an Apple TV (the device, not the subscription) and on there she uses swiftfin. The only issue has been sound not working on certain audio tracks on certain movies, but in general it is easy for anyone.

Both are very familiar interfaces for anyone used to playing something from a streaming service.

[–] matchbook1498@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not sure about swiftfin but try the option downmix to stereo somewhere in the client playback settings

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks, I didn't manage to find many options in swiftfin, you don't know if I can enforce it for a user from the server side?

[–] matchbook1498@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That will be transcoding so from the server side make sure it's enabled and working. Then you can limit the bitrate (per-user, or globally)

This way the client will stream the content and not direct play it.

Hopefully this fixes the issue with audio.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

I think I tried this when troubleshooting and didn't notice a difference. Nevermind, I pretty easily taught her how to bring up the menu and switch audio streams so she can solve it herself now.

[–] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

This is legit the opposite of my experience. I am a relatively tech savvy user, I like to fiddle with all the settings and an ugly UI doesn't inherently deter me as long as the experience is good, so when I first installed jellyfin I was ready to have a clunky experience fighting the UI.

Despite that, I was legitimately surprised at how Jellyfin was far less confusing for me to use out of the box than plex ever was. I found Plex's UI very confusing to navigate on my TV and my family did not like using it either. I remember especially hating all the extra categories and freemium content plex added that I wasn't interested in viewing but couldn't remove (or at least did not find a way to remove). In Jellyfin all of my content is just there and very easily categorized and there's no superfluous elements in the UI, just my stuff that I want to watch.

I remember plex also gave me more trouble during installation than jellyfin did. I actually found jellyfin very pleasant and intuitive to setup. Plex sent me down a Google rabbit hole to diagnose why it wouldn't boot at all.

It was genuinely such an awful experience as a first-time user that it made me wonder why anyone would use plex.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

I remember especially hating all the extra categories and freemium content plex added that I wasn't interested in viewing but couldn't remove (or at least did not find a way to remove).

Not doubting your experience at all. For all I know it’s a new option; I just discovered it, but for the other folks like me still stuck with Plex, most (all?) of this can be disabled in the Online Media Sources setting on the server (yeah - I know 🙄)…

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never really understood intuitive as a description for user interfaces. I remember back when opinion articles on Tech news websites would use that term to mean it "looks and functions exactly like Windows XP"

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Idiomatic usage of ‘intuitive’ regarding interfaces breaks down into

  1. ‘familiar’, so, confusing intuition with knowledge, or

  2. ‘discoverable’, which is more accurate and describes things like icons and tooltips and menus, where the rules of usage become more or less apparent with exploration and logic.

[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

Yep. What's considered intuitive UI changes depending on what you're used to.

It's why Google fought so hard to put Chromebooks in American classrooms.