this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
366 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

12770 readers
1807 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They'd probably sell even more of their naming scheme was less confusing.

[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 17 points 1 day ago

so that's not just me being unable to keep a good hierarchy of their shit in my thought cabinet?

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How is it confusing?

Well minus the part where theres 8GB versions with no name differences..

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's confusing because they constantly change their numbering scheme. Nvidia has stayed consistent in the last 17 years

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

Well yea... But nvidia didn't change their naming scheme because they use it to mislead people.

A 5080 today is equivalent to what a 1060 used to be when it comes to raw sillicon if I remember correctly.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's just "confusing" because people are used to nvidia naming

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well good thing the 9070 series is the series that is trying to adopt a more Nvidia-like naming scheme.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it has two names. But slightly less confusing

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The 9070 had two names? You're talking about the regular, the XT, and GRE?

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I am not retaking the GRE to use that card.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm wooshing. Is that some kind of test where you live?

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah it's the exam you take for grad school in the US for some colleges. I think it is the "graduate readiness exam" but it's been a few years and I cant spare 10 seconds to look lol.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I thought it was confusing because this is the 3rd changeup to their naming in recent years.

RX 580 to RX Vega 56 and 64 to RX 5700 to 9070. Yes it's still the intuitive "bigger number better" and "first number is generation", but I can see how people might be frustrated with it whereas nvidia has consistency.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Consistency? Nvidia does the exact same thing, so yeah I guess that's consistent. That reliable numeric with the Nvidia GeForce Titan, Nvidia Titan, and Nvidia Titan RTX (yes those are all very different cards).

And don't even get me started on the workstation Quadro card naming, with the Quadro RTX 4000, RTX A4000, RTX 4000 (Ada generation), and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Then you have the server cards. L4, L40, A100, H100 then rtx 6000 Blackwell (workstation and server editions are same name but different cards)

It goes on

[–] cron@feddit.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Don't forget the Radeon VII (announced 2019) that didn't fit in any scheme.

I think they had to make that change because there was a Radeon 9700 back in the ATI days or something. I just wish they hadn't done the RX thing. Because those charts where people compare GPU performance will have legends like:

RX-7600 RTX-5060 RX-9060XT TXT-6060RXT TVX-5040T RTX-4060

and you say "There's no consistency with generation or manufacturer and I'm pretty sure one of those is the part number of a cylinder head for a Toyota Tacoma.

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 4 points 19 hours ago

I can't wait for an RTX 9070 to replace my RX 9070 XT!

Just like how the Z890 chipset from Intel is not the same generation as the X870 chipset from AMD.