this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
650 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
2345 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sudoku@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (12 children)

People said they will never upgrade from 7 to 10, and now they are saying they will never upgrade from 10 to 11

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

^ This, I had to be dragged kicking and screaming from 7 to 10, and now looking forward to another 3 years of Win10 security updates, while fervently praying that Adobe and my online games add Linux support during that time >_>

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Just ditch those games.not worth it

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ah yes the classic purist arguement.

If the applications I want to use don't support Linux then apparently that's their problem. I wish I didn't have to live in the real world, but unfortunately I can't pay my mortgage in moral righteousness. If I can't use the programs I need to use my job, because I've decided to switch to an operating system that they don't support, I'm the one that's going to suffer.

So no you can't just ditch applications that don't have Linux support.

In the real world you have to dual boot and that's a pain in the arse because it means Microsoft are still going to be getting some money from me.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's a catch 22. If you need applications to make money sure. But games. Come on.

I get a PC from my job, it has windows and that's their choice.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fuck sort of dipshit argument is this for video games...?

He was saying ditch video games man... VIDEO GAMES.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

I can't switch to purely Linux because I need windows in order to be able to do my job. The fact I also play games on the computer is irrelevant.

I don't understand what you're not understanding.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yeah, some people get really defensive when you suggest they can get all the things they are asking for, and all they have to do is stop giving money to user-hostile developers. And saying kernel-level anti-cheat is hostile to the user is a massive understatement. Why would you defend Saudi Arabia having kernel-level access to your computer just to play a game? (It's crazy that that statement isn't even a joke in the context of EA.)

I understand if someone decides not to take the suggestion, but it is still a reasonable suggestion to make.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)