this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
678 points (91.4% liked)

Science Memes

17464 readers
2480 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 60 points 2 days ago (5 children)

5 isn't a valid function name, is obviously the right answer.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How can you be sure it's not defined when we only see one line?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They didn't say it's not defined, they said it's not a valid name. Most languages don't allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that's the case.

But that's assuming this isn't some really obscure language.

load more comments (3 replies)