this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
254 points (98.5% liked)

World News

50970 readers
1828 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/5816495

Archived version

Russia should “curb” the size of its army and military budget in order to ensure a lasting peace in Ukraine, said the EU’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, adding that Western leaders should not fall into the “trap” of discussing restrictions on Kyiv’s army during peace talks with Moscow.

Kallas’ comments come after US President Donald Trump ramped up pressure on Brussels and Kyiv over the past week to end the war on terms that many regard as favourable to Moscow – including by potentially limiting the size of Kyiv’s military.

...

The former Estonian prime minister added that current peace plans overwhelmingly seek “concessions” from Kyiv but not from Moscow, and warned that the Kremlin’s soaring military expenditure – expected to reach 7.2% of the country’s annual GDP this year – poses a “threat to us all”.

“We have always said that it’s a sovereign right for every country to decide the size of the military, and that’s why we shouldn’t walk into that trap that Russia is setting, talking about capping [the] Ukrainian army,” Kallas said. “I mean, Ukraine has never attacked Russia.”

Her latter remarks were echoed earlier on Wednesday morning by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

“As a sovereign nation, there can be no limitations on Ukraine’s armed forces that would leave the country vulnerable to future attacks,” von der Leyen told the European Parliament in Strasbourg.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I respectfully disagree.

The only chance for a 'just' and lasting peace in Ukraine and Europe is a a complete defeat of Putin's Russia. Everything else doesn't end the war but will extend it.

Russia must leave the whole of Ukraine.

[–] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think you're both right as your stated opinions views are not diametrically opposed. I suspect the original commenter was not commenting to an utopian dream of a just peace, here. Their comment seems to be addressing realpolitik. The super power in the region and the current hegemonic super power in the world are aligned.. and so is the new world super power, China when it comes to it. With that background, both Europe and Ukraine will loose and will have to accept what's given to them.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

This is correct, as I am looking at the situation right now, I don't see a realistic way for Ukraine to kick out Russia from their land completely, unless something big happens, I believe we are looking forward to a negotiated peace.

As a Swede, who gladly supports all aid packages with supplies, weapons and materiel we send, I wan't nothing more than for Ukraine to kick Russia to the curb, but I don't see that happening.

I'd rather prepare for a bad negotiated peace, if ever so short, and be surprised by Ukraine succeeding, than the opposite.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I disagree that the EU will have to face reality on this. The EU is definitely strong enough to support Ukraine on its own and kick Russia out; the problem is the lack of political will and, frankly, spine. I mean the fact that there are still new sanctions coming says everything that needs to be said.

[–] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you honestly think the EU can stand alone against the super powers? With what? A lot of European munitions come from one of them. Sure, maybe the EU could throw all it's chips in to the war effort and may squeak out a victory but they would have to dedicate around 80% of their income to it. We're talking taking a World War 3 stance of preparedness. And be willing to go bankrupt in the process. If that happens the only result is Russia comes in an sells the EU for parts.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With what?

Uh... The (combined) second largest economy in the world? The only reason the EU isn't considered a superpower is the chicken shit neoliberals running it; do you seriously think Russia and their "special military operation" can take the full weight of France? Germany? Italy? Really the only thing EU countries are missing is the military production to sustain more aid for Ukraine, which is not exactly a hard problem. You're talking about Russia like it's the Soviet Union, but it's just not.

[–] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 7 hours ago

I'm not just factoring in Russia, here. If it was just Russia here you'd have a point. Russia has allies. The Trump Whitehouse and it seems that China is soft on Russia too. If push comes to shove, I really can't guarantee that either of them would fall in line behind the EU. Add to that the authoritarian Narendra Modi's India I really don't think the EU would stand a chance...

Although, on the flip side, the EU may have allies themselves in Australia and Canada, and perhaps the UK plus the Scandinavian countries. But, even then...

I guess it also comes down to how much the different factions want the fight.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

I fully agree, but we are talking about two different things.

I said that currently I don't see an end to the war that doesn't include Ukraine having to give up land.

That is all that I said, I actually forgot to add what I wrote in a comment a few days back, where I said that any agreement where Ukraine looses land is bound to lead to a new conflict relatively shortly thereafter.

My earlier comment specifically called out that Ukraine loosing land is unfair.

I truly wish that Ukraine can muster the strength to kick Russia out baldy enough that Russia learn their lesson.

I am a Swede and I smile every time we give more aid, weapons and other related materiels to Ukraine, I gladly pay my taxes for this.

At the same time, if I try to look realistically at the conflict, at this point in time I don't see Ukraine kicking Russia out, it looks more and more as the end of the current conflict will come in the form of a negotiated peace, if only for a relatively short time.