this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
169 points (98.3% liked)

News

33313 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the release of the Epstein files looming, experts warn that the expected documents will only be the tip of the iceberg in what could turn into a decades-long fight over transparency.

The passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act started a 30-day countdown to the release of records related to child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his associates by the Justice Department.

The text of the law, however, gives the Justice Department and the attorney general, Pam Bondi, significant discretion in deciding what exactly to release and what to withhold from the public.

The law allows the attorney general to withhold the release of files that “depict or contain” child sexual abuse material or contain images of death, physical abuse or injury, for example.

However, the law also gives the attorney general the power to withhold information that they believe would “jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution.” It also allows the department to withhold classified information, which is to be defined by a presidential executive order.

National security, however, provides the broadest justification for withholding information, with the law giving the attorney general the power to judge whether certain information poses a threat to national security. Given Epstein’s deep ties to both foreign governments and intelligence agencies, the umbrella of national security could potentially cover huge swaths of what the government knows about Epstein.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I haven't understood the fight for the "release of the Epstein files" since the start.

What's to prevent them releasing fake documents?

As if this administration would ever release information detrimental to Trump or any other republican in favor.

The coming release will include nothing of substance about republicans.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most likely there are a few other "originals" out there that keep all involved parties in check.
Epstein had files stashed on the island but also his Manhattan office (which got stolen after the fbi opened the safe but did not remove them), ghislaine is said to have files, and probably one copy is in the hands of putin, epstein was in Moscow....
So if the trump admin releases an overtly fake version that exonerates everyone "on his side" another party can release opposing documents.

This already somewhat happened last month, where the administration released redacted files and highly selected documents, where suddenly various publicly unknown epstein emails surfaced that pointed back to trump.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, but will any of Trump's supporters really care what may be in the original documents if a doctored set released by the administration provides cover?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

They wouldn't care regardless.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

trump's supporters dont matter in the grand scheme of things, not really. it's not the cult members you need to convince, it's the non-cult. the grifters and opportunists will flip on whoever the instant it looks like they might finally face personal accountability for their actions, a handful of true-believers like MTG will draw the line at (openly) helping/enabling pedophiles (if not for their own limited moral compass then for their own personal safety)...plenty of people in this country who'd have no issue executing pedos and their enablers if it looks like they might get off scot-free

load more comments (4 replies)