this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
1415 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

17351 readers
877 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Edit: I accept I am wrong here. His style looks like AI slop to me. I see his responses in the screenshots. I'm wrong. I'll keep my statement about slop as-is, though, since it's true.

HELLO THERE!

DID YOU KNOW USING AI SLOP AS A CARTOON IS HARMING THE ENVIRONMENT?

~~Brian Ahearn may make poignant cartoons, but his use of generative AI to illustrate them is sad.~~

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 62 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Does he though??

I looked into it and found this from not even all that long ago.

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

I'm all for calling slop out, but we gotta be sure. It does kinda have that style but I don't see other signs.

Edit: He's posted his art on Instagram since at least 2020, well before AI image models could put out anything nearly passable.

collapsed inline media

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its already a thing where random internet users will scream "AI slop" at indie game developers and many of them spend more time arguing that it's not, showing evidence and still losing sales because of it.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

The "AI slop" people have quickly gotten as annoying as the "repost" people or "and then Albert Einstein clapped" people IMO.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

The wolf spider art is familiar to me. It also is distinctly different from the salamander art to my eyes. I get it, my mistake. I have edited my comment.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't get the joke with the beaver.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Vanilla flavoring used to be made from castoreum, which is harvested from beaver anal glands

[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Something something anal glands

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

HA! Anal glands....

[–] tomiant@piefed.social -2 points 2 days ago

I, too, lie about not using AI to make money.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago

How do you know it's AI?

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That doesn´t look at all like AI slop

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 days ago

The line weight and huge, perfectly centered round eyes all are hallmarks of AI slop. I accept that I'm wrong about him specifically, but this style looks like like AI to me.

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah as someone pointed out to me in another post. AI slop stole from artists like these hence why it looks similar and some of us have this initial negative reaction. Farking waste of air those thieving tech bros!

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, because such a thing doesn't exist.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But also because (at least as far as I can tell), he doesn't use AI.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

There are topics to debate on concerning AI use, but in the end art itself is always subjective. What's funny is that AI has gotten to a level now where if used carefully it might fly under the radar of AI critics, meanwhile they are attacking artists who aren't using AI but have a style that seems to them to be "fake".

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

I knew it was harming the environment.