133
Montana Becomes First State to Enshrine ‘Right to Compute’ Into Law - Montana Newsroom
(montananewsroom.com)
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
76672 readers
2042 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Its Orwellian double-speak. It implements restrictions on how people in Montana are allowed to use their personal property (computers) where no restrictions existed before.
Figured it was something like this.
Don't listen to them; they're full of shit. The bill restricts the government from restricting use of private compute resources unless they can prove they don't have a less restrictive way of addressing a legitimate problem.
But you don't understand, we all hate AI so much that this must be evil somehow.
Which is funny because the bill explicitly states that deepfakes and data centers are things the government can restrict.
I just read the bill. Where are you seeing restrictions? I'm reading it as restrictions are banned unless there is compelling reason for the government to enact such restrictions. That's all well enough defined.
Only negative thing I'm seeing is this seems to make banning new DCs a lot tougher.
Tell me you haven't read the bill without telling me you haven't read the bill.
It absolutely does not place restrictions on the use of personal property. It does the exact opposite.
It's a whopping 6 pages and mostly double-spaced and more white space. And lemmy upvotes these cynical comments without a shred of investigation.
I'm reading it as making data centers harder to block, now I'm not so sure. Your take?
The bill explicitly states that data centers being a public nuisance is a "Compelling government interest," so I don't think it's geared towards protecting data centers.
Edit: there is one major issue with the bill; it still keeps the door open for age verification.
Missed that line! Thanks!