this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)
Linux
9966 readers
437 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
1%
All that work for 1%?
And what does 'somewhat numerical in nature' and 'more than that' mean ?
The calculator gets 1.2% ?
Old tests on old compilers run on old Intel CPUs may have regressions. I forget the details, but back when all this was new, some CPUs would downclock if they even *see *an AVX2/AVX512 instruction.
Modern CPUs (mostly) don't do that.
It also shrinks the packages some (so less bandwidth and client disk usage, at the cost of compile time/disk space on the host's side, which is a decent trade), and applications that show more improvement tend to be more intense anyway.
its not calculator, but often stuff which benefits from avx, so hashing, compression, etc.